Dexta Robotics are looking to create the next generation VR input device, one that not only lets you interact with virtual objects but also lets you sense the size and solidity of them, letting you touch virtual reality. This is the Dexmo exoskeleton glove.

The technology that enables the core experience that comprises virtual reality is progressing quickly, but as VR headsets become more advanced companies are looking to where the next generational leap in VR will come from. Arguably, that next advance will probably involve input. By the end of the year, we’ll have three major VR platforms with motion controllers paired with their systems, with the HTC Vive already providing out of the box Lighthouse-tracked controllers, Oculus’ Touch set to launch by the end of the year and PlayStation VR’s Move controllers set to see a resurgence alongside the headset’s launch in October. So what’s the next step for VR?

If you’re a long time reader of Road to VR, you may recall Dexta Robotics. They’re the company behind Dexmo, a robotic exoskeleton glove that provides force feedback to simulate the act of touching objects in virtual reality. Dexta believe that this advanced form of haptic feedback encapsulates a next step in the VR experience. Well, Dexta are back and they’re ready to show the latest version of their devices.

Dexmo works by capturing the full range of your hand motion, providing what Dexta term as “instant force feedback”. With Dexmo, the company claim, you can feel the size, shape, and stiffness of virtual objects. “You can touch the digital world.” When your virtual avatar encounters a virtual object, its physical properties are, its physical properties are encountered via Dexmo’s dynamic grasping-handling software, which then provide computed variable force feedback, the glove essentially applies inverse force to your fingers, allowing virtual objects to provide a sensation of ‘pushing back’ against your fingers, just like a real object.

That’s impressive enough, but thanks to the variable nature of the force applied, the gloves can also translate more subtle physical object properties, the company says, so you can detect the softness of a rubber duck compared to the solidity of a rock, for example. You can see some of the examples of how this works in practice in the demonstration video above. “We conducted many studies where test subjects performed tasks using Vive controller or Dexmo. Tasks such as turning a knob, grasping an odd-shaped object, playing piano, pressing buttons, and throwing a ball. As expected, no contest! Users preferred Dexmo, and reportedly enjoyed a much higher level of immersion.”

SEE ALSO
PSVR 2 Works on PC Without the Adapter If You Have the Right Graphics Card

Right now, the Dexmo works in tandem with two Vive controllers strapped to the underside of the user’s arms to provide positional tracking of your hands in VR; that tracking is something the company is looking to integrate properly at a later date, either via Lighthouse tracking licensing, recently opened up to developers by Valve, or another method yet to be decided.

In terms of software integration, Dexta provide an SDK which allows developers to assign physical property values to virtual objects, so that the VR experience can send that data to the battery powered gloves, wirelessly communicating with the host via NRF, with Dexta citing Bluetooth and WiFi as “too slow” for their needs, claiming their solution achieves around 25-50ms of input latency.

Dexta are now ready to show the latest version of the Dexmo, which they believe now represents the core of what they intend to offer in a final device; this latest prototype can be seen in the images and videos in this article.

We wanted to dig a little deeper into the history and future of Dexmo, so we spoke to Aler Gu, CEO of Dexta Robotics.

Road to VR: The Dexmo has come a long way since we first saw it. Can you outline the some of the key milestones you’ve passed?

Gu: Indeed Dexmo has came a long way. Ever since Oct 2013 when we initiated Project Dexmo, we haven’t stop improving it:

  • In June 2014 we came up with the design of “switching force feedback”, proved the concept and filed a US patent for it.
  • In Oct 2014 we launched and then canceled the KS project. But we found our way of gathering capital after that and pushed Dexmo into Manufacturing afterall.
  • In June 2015 our experiments of the “variable force feedback” design along with some other force feedback attempt was proven to be working. We filed several patents to protect the IP as well.
  • In Feb 2016 our force feedback unit was successfully batch manufactured and then assembled into Dexmo. It was a big deal for us because the FFU was designed from scratch and it took a lot of effort to go from sth that “barely works” to a “manufacturable reliable product”
  • In June 2016, we finished multiple Unity Demos to demonstrate what Dexmo is capable of. And our SDK was finally finalized.
SEE ALSO
VR MMO 'Zenith' Releases Final Content Update & Drops Price Amid Development Halt

Road to VR: Your promotional video predicts that Dexmo will be beneficial in various industries, but I wonder if you have your eye on a consumer device? How much would such a consumer product cost?

Gu: It’s not the right time to talk about price now. Before actually selling Dexmo to consumers, we have to make sure it works right out of the box. So our plans for now is partner up with talented VR developing firms and deliver the best immersion experience possible. So when people get their Dexmo, they would immediately realize how game-changing this innovation is. We are also interested in talking to the leaders of the VR/MR industries to see possibilities of in-depth cooperation.

Road to VR: You’re using the SteamVR controllers to provide positional tracking. What are your plans for tracking on the final devices? Would licensing Lighthouse tracking from Valve be something you’d look at?

Gu: It’s funny two years ago we have to explain to people “tracking is a solved problem”, and nowadays thanks to Valve we no longer need to do that anymore. People get it. It is very easy to integrate the lighthouse tracking system into Dexmo, and we will definitely look into that. What you see in the video already projects what can be done.

Beside Lighthouse, Dexmo can also work with any tracking methods. For example we tried to use the tracking coordinates that Hololens API provided, and that doesn’t even require the setup of lighthouse. I guess what I want to say is: The problem that Dexmo solved is hand tracking with integrated force feedback, tracking can come from anything because there are a lot of options for developers to choose from.

Road to VR: How much do the current units weigh and what’s the current battery life? Do they use Bluetooth, WiFi?

Gu: Nothing is definite though but I can give you an idea: Dexmo weighs slightly more than an iPhone 6 Plus [circa 172g], and can be made even lighter. The battery can ideally run over 4 hours when fully charged. It uses NRF modules for wireless communication. Wifi and BT was too slow for our applications.

Road to VR: How simple is Dexmo to develop for? For example, if a developer takes your SDK and add Dexmo integration, what work is involved in making this happen?

SEE ALSO
'Fisherman's Tale' Studio Unveils Mysterious VR Adventure 'One True Path' for Quest 3 & PC VR, Trailer Here

Gu: Dexmo is very developer friendly and well documented. With our SDK, libDexmo, any developer should be able to pick up Dexmo in a few hours after reading the documents. We built some Unity plugins that is somewhat similar to the Vive. Developers can just pull out a pair of hands and our grasping algorithm will take in place and automatically handle the grasping for them. Frankly all they need to do is to apply the colliders and stiffness to objects.

Road to VR: Can you give us some of your reasoning behind the cancellation of your 2014 Kickstarter campaign for the Dexmo?

Gu: What we demonstrated on KS back in 2014 was only a concept. When we saw people’s reaction, we were flattered. But we soon realized they expected a lot more than what we could deliver at that time. Most backers wanted a all-in-one final product that they could immediately use, with complete platform support. Back then VR wasn’t as established as it is now. We know that if people didn’t have the knowledge to even set up a tracking system themselves, they probably gonna have a bad time using it. So we actually needed way more than $200k to research and manufacture the product to meet people’s (unrealistic) expectations by then.

So there was a decision for us to make: Either we take the money, pretend none of these issues exist, lie to our backers then deliver a shitty product that nobody is satisfied with (or just not deliver at all like the ControlVR, what a laugh); Or to be responsible, do the right thing, commit to the challenges instead of just talking about it, and come back when we actually have a better product.

Being an engineer, I am not much of a talker. I believe a product will speak for itself. I hope people can feel the time and effort we put into it. It was a tough choice by then, but I am glad we made the right decision. And today, I am happy to say that this technology finally meets every expectation I had for it.

Thanks to Aler Gu for his time. If you’re keen to know more about Dexmo, we’re hoping to bring you hands on experience with the devices soon. In the meantime, check out Dexta Robotics’ website for more information.

This article may contain affiliate links. If you click an affiliate link and buy a product we may receive a small commission which helps support the publication. More information.


Paul James
Based in the UK, Paul has been immersed in interactive entertainment for the best part of 27 years and has followed advances in gaming with a passionate fervour. His obsession with graphical fidelity over the years has had him branded a ‘graphics whore’ (which he views as the highest compliment) more than once and he holds a particular candle for the dream of the ultimate immersive gaming experience. Having followed and been disappointed by the original VR explosion of the 90s, he then founded RiftVR.com to follow the new and exciting prospect of the rebirth of VR in products like the Oculus Rift. Paul joined forces with Ben to help build the new Road to VR in preparation for what he sees as VR’s coming of age over the next few years.
  • J.C.

    Glad to see a peripheral company realizing they need to build software interfaces into commonly used game engines BEFORE releasing their product, and use existing tracking systems. This seems like a great way to interface with objects, but I don’t see any buttons for functions that are “unnatural”, like opening a menu.

    • In one of the demos in the video some text pops up saying “press button to continue” although that may be referring to a virtual button

    • Diogo Moraes

      I think the “unnatural” functions could be achieved through gestures, like in Sword Art Online(an anime showing a virtual reality world), the menu is displayed when the user closes their hand and sticks out the index finger, and then slides it down.

  • Bryan Ischo

    I would expect this to feel kind of strange. Since you can’t stop your hand or arm from moving, I would guess it would feel like objects in the virtual world have a thin “skin” that you can feel but easily push through. If you keep your hand in a steady position and if the finger pullers are strong enough you wouldn’t be able to push “through” the skin with your fingers, but you could push through by moving your whole hand, arm, or body. Also, you’re going to feel a counter force on the back of your hand every time you touch something with your fingers.

    • You might be waiting awhile for the full body suit. This is more for picking up and grasping things. So you can’t reach out and have your hand stopped by a door, but you can pick up a key, and *sorta* feel the door if you’re careful. It’s quite a bit shy of a exo-suit. We’re at more of the “disembodied spirit” stage then the “being there” stage of VR. Depending on how fast and reliable it is, Dexmo could be a welcome addition of physical presences, even if a minor one.

    • Some valid concerns, you sure dampened my excitement for the product :P I still want to try it though, I’m pretty sure that a good experience can be had if handled with care.

  • BlogaBlingaDonga

    I worked a bit with the guys behind the Novint Falcon: http://www.novint.com/index.php/novintfalcon

    This seems like a logical step forward from that type of haptic feedback. Sculpting and other functions where fine-tuned force-feedback really shines should give them lots of potential clients, although for general computer navigation I’m hoping for a fine-tuned Leap Motion camera.

    • Danilo Pallares Suarez

      I have a falcon and that was the first thing that came to mind when I read this article. I’ve been waiting for someone to come up with a glove or controller like this. It’s just perfect for VR

  • unreal_ed

    Wow! They have Patented Machanics !!

  • DiGiCT Ltd

    “With Dexmo, the company claim, you can feel the size, shape, and stiffness of virtual objects.”

    shape, yes stiffness yes in a certain way.

    Size for sure not as this is only tracking your hand/fingers mostly as you see above your wrists, elbows and shoulder joint have freedom to move which let you be able to mover trough the object.

  • James Friedman

    Cyborg style!

  • RockstarRepublic

    After grabbing a novint falcon a long time ago, I figured someone would come up with this method for the hands. Its basically the same concept as the falcon.

    The only thing I would add or explore is using air pressure (filling up little air sacs) for the palm and figures, as a means of feeling pressure. On the other hand it might be a problem if a controller is being used, since skin contact with some input devices is also important.

  • The fact that they don’t want to talk about the price, means that it costs really a lot. I think that they will start selling to businesses (maybe for training of people like surgeons in VR) where price is not that important

    • Eddie Offermann

      I disagree. They explain why they’re not talking about commercial products – and it makes sense to me. They want a mature, stable product. You don’t want a cheap product that works most of the time. You want a solid product that’s dependable. Human interface design has a very low tolerance for error & instability. If your mouse only registered a click 80% of the time, that sounds like a pretty good number – but it would make you throw your mouse in the garbage before lunchtime. I think that’s why they’re sitting here with a prototype and not a commercial product.

  • Eric Pipedream Leisy

    I can’t help but think of those sci-fi movies where the “early” exoskeleton prototypes break the arms of users through software errors. :) “Oops. Software glitch just broke all my fingers.” That’d be a bummer.

    • Marco

      That would be funny

    • Ainar

      Yeah, I think I’ll skip those and wait for direct neural input devices, ’cause they seem safer. Oh, wait…

    • Goran Palmblad

      Makes me think of Iron man 2 with some government exoskeletons “gone wrong”

  • Ainar

    Sooo…boob grabbing gloves? Come on, you know that’s the first app people are going to create for them :)

    • Jeremy Alexander

      You do realize that you don’t need special gloves to grab boobs, right? ;)

  • Jeremy Alexander

    Those look like a finger mangling lawsuit ready to happen.

  • Jeremy Alexander

    I don’t care about the touch feedback, I would just like a simple pair of gloves, or sensors with elastic bands so that the VR system knows where my limbs are and represents that in game.